Is it clear which entity operates the service and how it can be contacted?
SAFETY CENTRE · EDITORIAL REGISTER
Service warnings
We publish warnings when the information gathered justifies particular caution. Every public entry should state a specific reason, date and verification status. We do not publish rumours or automatic accusations.
PUBLIC REGISTER
Active Radio Sloty warnings
The list includes only entries intended for public publication. Working cases, unverified reports and internal editorial notes are not shown here.
0active entries
0working cases
—updated
No entry does not mean a recommendation.
We may not have assessed an operator, a case may still be under review, or the information may have changed. Before using an external service, check its operator details, terms and legality in your jurisdiction.
No active public warnings.
This describes the current state of the register; it does not confirm that every service is safe. Use your own caution when dealing with external services.
BEFORE USING A SERVICE
Four things worth checking yourself.
The public register does not replace basic operator checks. A few minutes of verification may reveal warning signs that are not visible in an advert or promotion.
Are withdrawal, verification and restriction rules available before you deposit money?
Does the service avoid asking for passwords, 2FA codes, CVV data or payments outside its official system?
Is use of the service permitted in the country and place where you are currently located?
A warning is an editorial notice, not a verdict.
An entry means that, based on the available information, we see a justified reason for particular caution. It does not replace a regulator's or court's decision, a bank's action or the operator's complaint procedure.
- which area raised concerns,
- the case's current status,
- when the information was reviewed.
- an automatic finding of illegality,
- a guaranteed outcome to a user's dispute,
- an assessment of every service provided by the entity.
A public status appears only after verification.
The case is analysed internally and is not presented as a confirmed warning.
The material gathered justifies a public recommendation for particular caution.
A status used for more serious or persistent risk indicators following an editorial decision.
New information may change the content or status, or result in removal from the active register.
When can a signal justify a public warning?
We do not use a single automatic test. What matters is the reliability of the material, its context, whether it can be confirmed and the seriousness of the potential risk.
Conflicting entity details, a licence that is difficult to verify, impersonation of another brand, or missing basic operator information.
Repeated, well-documented withdrawal problems or demands for additional payments to 'unlock' funds.
Material restrictions disclosed only after a deposit, use of a promotion or the start of a withdrawal process.
Requests for passwords, 2FA codes, full card details, payments outside the official system, or suspicious communication channels.
A prolonged lack of response may add weight to other confirmed issues, although it does not by itself establish wrongdoing.
Multiple independent reports describing the same mechanism may strengthen a signal if their content can be verified.
We separate a user's account from information that can be confirmed.
Verification may include correspondence, dates, case and transaction identifiers, versions of terms, operator communications and independent sources. We treat material without a date or context cautiously.
- a timeline and specific dates,
- a case or transaction number,
- screenshots with visible context,
- operator responses,
- the terms in force at the time of the event.
- passwords or 2FA codes,
- full card numbers or CVV,
- seed phrases or private keys,
- unnecessary identity documents,
- third-party data without justification.
From report to decision.
Report received
We check whether there is enough information to begin an analysis.
Review
We compare the account of the case with documents and available sources.
Operator response
Where appropriate, we ask the operator to explain material issues.
Decision
A case may be closed, monitored, lead to suspension of promotion, or result in a public entry.
Updated
New credible information may change the public status at any time.
An operator may provide a response, correction or new documents.
Credible information that changes the facts is reviewed to the same standard as the original report. If an entry is outdated or inaccurate, it should be corrected.
If money or an account is at risk, do not wait for a response from Radio Sloty.
If you suspect account takeover, phishing, theft of funds or an unauthorised transaction, contact the operator, bank or payment provider and the appropriate authorities in your jurisdiction immediately. A report to Radio Sloty may help warn others, but it does not replace an emergency channel or formal complaint.
REPORT A PROBLEM
Do you have a specific case involving an operator?
Send a structured report. We do not publish its content automatically and do not treat the report itself as confirmation of the allegations.